Skip to content
AnpTaxCorp
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law
AnpTaxCorp

AnpTaxCorp

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law

substantive addition

There Can Be No Protective Addition In Absence Of Substantive Addition: ITAT Delhi

30 September 202326 September 2023 by Adv Aditya Narayan
protective addition

In the case before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi, the issue revolved around the assessment of an Assessee Firm, which had declared an income of Rs.12,220 during the relevant year. The firm was engaged in a wholesale scrap …

Read more

Please share
Categories Blog, Judiciary Leave a comment

Recent Posts

  • GST Appeal Limitation to Be Calculated in Calendar Months, Not 120 Days: Bombay High Court
  • GST Authorities Cannot Impose Penalty Under Section 122 Contrary to Binding CBIC Circular: Gauhati High Court
  • Karnataka High Court: Assessing Officer Cannot Reassess DSIR-Approved R&D Expenditure for Deduction Under Section 35(2AB)
  • GST Paid Under Wrong Tax Head Can Be Transferred to Correct Head; Section 74 Cannot Be Invoked Without Tax Evasion: Bombay High Court
  • Bank Liable to Repay Fixed Deposit Amounts Despite Fraudulent Loans Obtained Without Depositor’s Consent: Madras High Court
  • Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Does Not Bar Audit of Earlier Records Under Section 65: Delhi High Court
  • Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessment Order Passed Without Issuing Draft Assessment Order to Eligible Assessee
  • Asset Reconstruction Companies Can Replace Banks as Complainants in Pending Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court Ruling
  • Inclusion of Penal Charges in Debt Claim Does Not Take Away NCLT’s Jurisdiction to Admit CIRP Application: Gujarat High Court
  • Bombay High Court: Entire Cost of Second Flat Cannot Be Added to Taxable Capital Gains Merely Because Section 54F Exemption Is Denied

Featured Post

  • GST Appeal Limitation to Be Calculated in Calendar Months, Not 120 Days: Bombay High Court
  • GST Authorities Cannot Impose Penalty Under Section 122 Contrary to Binding CBIC Circular: Gauhati High Court
  • Karnataka High Court: Assessing Officer Cannot Reassess DSIR-Approved R&D Expenditure for Deduction Under Section 35(2AB)
  • GST Paid Under Wrong Tax Head Can Be Transferred to Correct Head; Section 74 Cannot Be Invoked Without Tax Evasion: Bombay High Court
  • Bank Liable to Repay Fixed Deposit Amounts Despite Fraudulent Loans Obtained Without Depositor’s Consent: Madras High Court
  • Archive

About Us

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us
©2025 Anp TaxCorp all rights reserved
  • Home
  • Corporate Law