Karnataka High Court: Assessing Officer Cannot Reassess DSIR-Approved R&D Expenditure for Deduction Under Section 35(2AB)

Karnataka High Court rules that Assessing Officers cannot revisit DSIR-approved R&D expenditure under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act. Introduction In an important ruling concerning tax incentives for scientific research and development, the Karnataka High Court has held that …

Read more

Please share

Bank Liable to Repay Fixed Deposit Amounts Despite Fraudulent Loans Obtained Without Depositor’s Consent: Madras High Court

Madras High Court holds Indian Overseas Bank liable to repay ₹3 crore fixed deposits despite fraudulent loans obtained against FDRs without depositor authorisation. The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that a bank cannot avoid its repayment obligations merely by claiming …

Read more

Please share

Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Does Not Bar Audit of Earlier Records Under Section 65: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court rules that retrospective GST registration cancellation does not prevent departmental audit under Section 65 of the CGST Act, including examination of earlier records. Introduction The cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect does not automatically deprive the …

Read more

Please share

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessment Order Passed Without Issuing Draft Assessment Order to Eligible Assessee

Bombay High Court quashes income tax assessment order passed without issuing a mandatory Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C, protecting taxpayers’ statutory rights. The Bombay High Court has reiterated that the Income Tax Department cannot bypass the mandatory procedure of …

Read more

Please share

Asset Reconstruction Companies Can Replace Banks as Complainants in Pending Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court Ruling

The Supreme Court upholds the Bombay High Court ruling allowing Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) to replace banks as complainants in pending cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Introduction In an important development concerning debt recovery …

Read more

Please share

Gauhati High Court Stays GST Penalty Proceedings Against Individual Partner Over Alleged Wrongful ITC Claim of ₹16.21 Crore

The Gauhati High Court stayed GST penalty proceedings against an individual partner over alleged wrongful ITC claims of ₹16.21 crore by a partnership firm, raising important questions on partner liability under Section 122(1)(A) of the CGST Act. Case Reference: Shri …

Read more

Please share

Charitable Institutions Cannot Be Denied Income Tax Exemption Merely for Collecting Service Charges: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Court holds that collection of service charges and generation of surplus income do not automatically convert charitable activities into commercial operations. The actual relationship between service charges and the cost of providing services must be examined. Introduction In an …

Read more

Please share

Allahabad High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging 18% GST on Online Legal Research Services: Key Observations in Aniket Gupta Case

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the levy of 18% GST on subscriptions to online legal research and legal education databases. However, the Court did not examine the constitutional validity or substantive reasonableness of …

Read more

Please share

ITAT Ahmedabad: Sale of Land Taxable Under Capital Gains, Not Business Income; Exemption on REIT Income Allowed

ITAT Ahmedabad rules land sale gains taxable under capital gains, not business income, and allows exemption on qualifying REIT dividend income under the Income-tax Act. Introduction The classification of income arising from the sale of immovable property has significant implications …

Read more

Please share

Failure to Issue GST DRC-04 Acknowledgement Makes Tax Proceedings Unsustainable: Madras High Court Orders Refund to Taxpayer

Madras High Court rules that failure to issue GST DRC-04 acknowledgement under Rule 142(2) can render GST proceedings unsustainable, sets aside assessment orders and directs refund of tax collected. Introduction The Madras High Court has reiterated the importance of following …

Read more

Please share

Chhattisgarh High Court Directs Income Tax Department to Refund Amounts Recovered from Cement Companies After Tax Demand Against Mining Department Was Quashed

Chhattisgarh High Court directs the Income Tax Department to refund amounts recovered from UltraTech Cement and Shree Cement after quashing of the tax demand against the State Mining Department. Introduction In an important ruling concerning tax recovery proceedings under the …

Read more

Please share