Insufficiently Stamped Documents Are Admissible in Section 138 NI Act Cases Without Prior Payment of Stamp Duty: Karnataka High Court

Karnataka High Court rules that insufficiently stamped documents can be admitted in Section 138 cheque bounce cases without prior payment of stamp duty or penalty. The Karnataka High Court has delivered an important ruling concerning the admissibility of insufficiently stamped …

Read more

Please share

Income Tax Department Not Bound to Accept Belated Replies or Personal Hearing Requests After SCN Deadline: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court rules that the Income Tax Department need not entertain belated SCN replies or personal hearing requests after the deadline under Section 144B. The High Court clarifies that taxpayers must respond to show-cause notices within the …

Read more

Please share

GSTAT: Recipient Cannot Be Penalised for Supplier’s Failure to Generate E-Invoice When Tax Invoice and E-Way Bill Accompany Goods

GSTAT Thiruvananthapuram rules that a recipient cannot be penalised under Section 129(1) for the supplier’s failure to generate an e-invoice when a valid tax invoice and e-way bill accompany the goods. The GST Appellate Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, has ruled that a …

Read more

Please share

Karnataka High Court: Seized Gold Jewellery Cannot Be Released Before AO Passes Order Giving Effect to CIT(A) and ITAT Relief

Karnataka High Court rules seized gold jewellery cannot be released before the Assessing Officer gives effect to CIT(A) and ITAT orders. Know the implications under Section 132B. The Karnataka High Court has clarified that gold, silver and diamond jewellery seized …

Read more

Please share

Karnataka High Court: Date of Sale Agreement Can Be Considered for Capital Gains Exemption Under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act

Karnataka High Court rules that the date of an agreement to sell can determine property transfer for Section 54 capital gains exemption where possession is delivered before execution of the sale deed. The Karnataka High Court has reaffirmed that the …

Read more

Please share

Karnataka High Court: Assessing Officer Cannot Reassess DSIR-Approved R&D Expenditure for Deduction Under Section 35(2AB)

Karnataka High Court rules that Assessing Officers cannot revisit DSIR-approved R&D expenditure under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act. Introduction In an important ruling concerning tax incentives for scientific research and development, the Karnataka High Court has held that …

Read more

Please share

Bank Liable to Repay Fixed Deposit Amounts Despite Fraudulent Loans Obtained Without Depositor’s Consent: Madras High Court

Madras High Court holds Indian Overseas Bank liable to repay ₹3 crore fixed deposits despite fraudulent loans obtained against FDRs without depositor authorisation. The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that a bank cannot avoid its repayment obligations merely by claiming …

Read more

Please share

Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Does Not Bar Audit of Earlier Records Under Section 65: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court rules that retrospective GST registration cancellation does not prevent departmental audit under Section 65 of the CGST Act, including examination of earlier records. Introduction The cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect does not automatically deprive the …

Read more

Please share

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessment Order Passed Without Issuing Draft Assessment Order to Eligible Assessee

Bombay High Court quashes income tax assessment order passed without issuing a mandatory Draft Assessment Order under Section 144C, protecting taxpayers’ statutory rights. The Bombay High Court has reiterated that the Income Tax Department cannot bypass the mandatory procedure of …

Read more

Please share

Asset Reconstruction Companies Can Replace Banks as Complainants in Pending Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court Ruling

The Supreme Court upholds the Bombay High Court ruling allowing Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) to replace banks as complainants in pending cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Introduction In an important development concerning debt recovery …

Read more

Please share

Gauhati High Court Stays GST Penalty Proceedings Against Individual Partner Over Alleged Wrongful ITC Claim of ₹16.21 Crore

The Gauhati High Court stayed GST penalty proceedings against an individual partner over alleged wrongful ITC claims of ₹16.21 crore by a partnership firm, raising important questions on partner liability under Section 122(1)(A) of the CGST Act. Case Reference: Shri …

Read more

Please share