Notice Returned as ‘Unclaimed’ at Correct Address Amounts to Deemed Service: Kerala High Court Clarifies Section 138 NI Act

In a significant ruling strengthening the legal framework governing cheque dishonour disputes, the Kerala High Court has reiterated that a demand notice returned with the postal endorsement “unclaimed” can still satisfy the statutory notice requirement under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …

Read more

Please share

Supreme Court: Dismissal Is the Harshest Punishment and Must Be Reserved Only for Grave Misconduct

In a significant judgment strengthening employee protection under service jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that dismissal from service should be imposed only in cases involving grave misconduct and only after carefully evaluating all relevant circumstances. The Court …

Read more

Please share

Termination Without Due Process: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reaffirms Protection of Workers Completing 240 Days of Service

In a notable judgment strengthening employee rights under Indian labour laws, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has reiterated that employers cannot terminate workers arbitrarily after they have completed 240 days of continuous service without complying with mandatory legal requirements under …

Read more

Please share

Contractual Employee Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: J&K and Ladakh High Court Upholds Termination for Unsatisfactory Performance

In a significant ruling clarifying the legal position relating to contractual employment in government-supported schemes, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has held that a contractual employee cannot invoke the constitutional safeguards available under Article 311 of …

Read more

Please share

Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act Invalid Without Specific Demand Amount: Kerala High Court

In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has clarified an essential procedural requirement under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, holding that a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 cannot be sustained unless the statutory demand notice explicitly mentions the exact …

Read more

Please share

BIG RELIEF FOR CORPORATE EXECUTIVES: Telangana High Court QUASHES EPF CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST MD, RULES DESIGNATION ALONE CANNOT FIX LIABILITY

In a significant ruling reinforcing the principles of vicarious liability in corporate offences, the Telangana High Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against the Chairman and Managing Director of Sankhya Infotech Limited in an alleged Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) default …

Read more

Please share

Orissa High Court Enhances MACT Compensation to ₹1.18 Crore: Favourable Tax Regime and Statutory Benefits Protected

In a significant ruling strengthening the rights of accident victims and their dependents, the Orissa High Court, in New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Namita Mohanty, enhanced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) to ₹1,18,40,045 along with …

Read more

Please share

Failure to Deposit EPF Dues on Time is a Penal Offence; Liability Cannot Be Avoided by Later Payments: Orissa High Court

In a significant ruling reinforcing the strict compliance framework under labour welfare laws, the Orissa High Court has held that failure to deposit Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) dues within the prescribed time constitutes a penal offence. The Court made it …

Read more

Please share

Allahabad High Court Quashes ₹2.14 Crore Recovery: A Landmark Ruling Against Disproportionate Disciplinary Action on Employees

In a significant judgment dated. 9 April 2026, reinforcing the principles of fairness and proportionality in disciplinary proceedings, the Allahabad High Court set aside a recovery order of ₹2.14 crore imposed on an employee, terming the punishment as “shockingly disproportionate.” …

Read more

Please share

Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Employers: VRS Cannot Be Stalled by Mere Show-Cause Notice

In a significant ruling reinforcing employee rights, the Supreme Court of India has held that an employer cannot block an employee’s voluntary retirement simply by issuing a show-cause notice, without initiating formal disciplinary proceedings within the prescribed notice period. The …

Read more

Please share