The Court set aside the CESTAT order and restored the appeal to its original number. It directed that the appeal should now be heard on its merits without requiring any further pre-deposit. The Delhi High Court has ruled that an …
The High Court ruled that irrespective of whether the delay was caused by the assessee or the department, the assessee was entitled to interest at a rate of 6% per annum. In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has …
The Gujarat High Court struck down Paragraph 2(2) of Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST, declaring it ultra vires Section 54 of the GST Act and inapplicable retrospectively. The Gujarat High Court has ruled in favor of Patanjali Foods Ltd., affirming its right …
The Court held that statutory rules supplement the Act rather than contradicting it. Since Form DRC-01 and DRC-07 include a designated section for the signature of the proper officer, the requirement becomes statutory. The Telangana High Court has ruled that …
The Delhi High Court has directed the NFAC to expedite the disposal of appeals to prevent prolonged delays. A roadmap has been drawn under the Central Action Plan 2024-25 to address the backlog efficiently. The Delhi High Court has expressed …
The ITAT set aside the previous order and directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment. The tribunal instructed the AO to take into account the decision of the CIT(E) on the condonation petition once it is finalized. The Income …
Supreme Court clarifies that, the Legislative laws are prospective in nature unless expressly stated to have retrospective application, whereas Judicial pronouncements are retrospective by default unless the judgment specifies its prospective effect. The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that …
This Supreme Court ruling strengthens legal protections for individuals facing arrest under the GST and Customs Acts. By extending CrPC safeguards to these laws, the Court ensures that tax enforcement authorities follow due process and refrain from arbitrary arrests. The …
A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan took note of the conflicting High Court rulings, emphasizing the need for a thorough legal examination. The Supreme Court of India has reserved its judgment on the contentious …
CBDT circular dated January 21, 2015 clarifies that the benefit under Section 54F and Section 54 is limited to one residential house. A recent Delhi High Court ruling denied capital gains tax exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax …
This ruling of High court serves as an important precedent, reinforcing that procedural delays should not automatically result in the dismissal of appeals, particularly when statutory requirements are met. The Madras High Court has ruled that an appeal cannot be …
This ruling of Madras High Court provides clarity on GST compliance and refund eligibility for businesses dealing with goods detention under Section 129. The Madras High Court, in the case of Chetna Steel Tubes Private Limited v. Goods and Service …
As per the court’s verdict, the initial seizure of cash by the GST department was unauthorized and illegal. The continued retention of the cash by the GST department and its handover to the Income Tax Department did not legitimize the …
Cases related to best judgment assessments under Section 62, emphasizing procedural fairness and legislative amendments. Section 62 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, governs the assessment of taxpayers who fail to file their GST returns. When …
Dismissing the Income Tax Department’s appeal, the Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the taxpayer, reaffirming that routine support services cannot be classified as FTS. In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has clarified that Fee for Technical …
The Court noted that if delays were condoned, it could undermine taxpayer protections outlined in Sections 73(10) and 75(2) of the GST Act. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that a delay of two days in issuing a Goods …
This judgment of court reaffirms that individual components of an SCN must be adjudicated separately unless explicitly quashed. The Delhi High Court has ruled that if a Show Cause Notice (SCN) is quashed on one issue, it does not imply …
The case was remanded by court to the original authority for fresh adjudication, with instructions to consider all submitted documents and provide a reasoned decision within three months. In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has held that the …
This Supreme Court judgment reaffirms the strict interpretation of Section 271AAA(2), making it clear that merely paying taxes voluntarily does not exempt an assessee from penalties if undisclosed income is admitted only at the assessment stage. The Supreme Court of …
This judgment sets a crucial precedent, ensuring that businesses across India are not unfairly restricted from obtaining GST registration in different states. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that authorities cannot refuse GST registration solely because the applicant belongs …