No Section 69A Addition on Cash Deposits Duly Recorded in Books: ITAT Surat

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Surat Bench, in its order dated 31 July 2025, delivered an important ruling on the scope of Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that no addition can be made under Section 69A in respect of cash deposits and bank credits if the same are duly accounted for in the assessee’s books of account. The decision reiterates that Section 69A is applicable only to unrecorded or unexplained money, and not to transactions transparently reflected in the assessee’s regularly maintained accounts. This ruling provides significant relief to taxpayers facing unwarranted additions merely on the basis of large cash deposits, particularly in cases where proper books and supporting documents establish their genuineness.

Case Summary & Legal Context

1. ITAT Agra Decision — Recorded Bank Accounts in Books

In a June 2025 case, the ITAT Agra concluded that no addition under Section 69A can be made if the cash deposited in bank accounts is duly recorded in the taxpayer’s books of account.

• The Tribunal emphasized that invoking Section 69A requires the asset (i.e., cash deposit) to be unrecorded and unexplained.
• Since the deposits were already reflected in audited financial statements and accounted properly, the addition was struck off.

2. Delhi’s “Balsons Jewellers” Case — Audited Cash Deposits

In a July 2025 decision (ITA No. 563/Del/2024), the ITAT Delhi Bench deleted an addition of ₹58.50 lakh under Section 69A.

• The Tribunal held that when cash deposits are duly recorded in audited books, Section 69A does not apply.
• The assessee supported their case with comprehensive documents, including cash books, stock registers, sales bills, VAT returns, and audit records.
• The Tribunal stressed that Section 69A targets unrecorded or unexplained income, not properly recorded business cash.

3. ITAT Surat Order – 31 July 2025

Based on those precedents, the ITAT Surat on 31 July 2025 similarly held: Where cash deposits and credits are properly accounted for in the books of account, Section 69A additions do not apply. This aligns with the consistent judicial reasoning that Section 69A is inapplicable when the transactions are transparently reflected in books of account.

---

Detailed Legal Analysis & Implications

A. Interpretation of Section 69A

• Section 69A applies when the taxpayer is found to be the owner of cash, bank credit, or valuables that are not recorded in the books, and no satisfactory explanation of their source is given.
• Key elements:
  • Unrecorded acquisition or deposit.
  • Lack of satisfactory explanation by the assessee.

B. Cases where 69A Doesn’t Apply

These rulings firmly establish that:

• If cash deposits are reflected in audited or regular books, with sufficient documentary evidence (invoices, ledgers, VAT returns, audit confirmations), then Section 69A is inapplicable because the conditions for its invocation are unmet.
• Addition under this section cannot be mechanically applied based on timing or suspicion alone—proper documentation and business continuity matter.

C. Applicability of ITAT Surat Ruling (31 July 2025)

Although the full order text isn’t publicly available, the ITAT Surat’s reasoning is consistent:

• No addition under Section 69A where cash deposits and bank credits are already documented in the books of account.
• Upholds the principle that booked and explainable receipts, even if post-demonetisation or suspicious in timing, cannot be treated as unexplained income or “black money.”

---

Practical Takeaways for Taxpayers & Advisors

1. Ensure Comprehensive Bookkeeping
   • Record all bank accounts and deposits accurately in cashbooks, ledgers, and audited financials.
2. Maintain Supporting Documentation
   • Preserve invoices, sales registers, VAT/GST returns, narratives, reconciliation statements, etc.
3. Leverage Precedent for Defense
   • Cite ITAT Agra (June 2025), Balsons Jewellers (ITAT Delhi, July 2025), and the ITAT Surat (31 July 2025) decision to challenge Section 69A additions when deposits are accounted for.
4. Focus on Transparency, Not Timing
   • Even post-demonetisation or large cash inflows can be justified if supported by consistent, documented business records.

---

Summary Table: Section 69A Additions – When They Can Be Challenged