Possible Grounds for Appeal Against Penalty Under Section 270A of Income Tax

An assessee can appeal against a penalty order under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961—Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income—before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] or the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), depending on the stage and scope. Below are key grounds on which such a penalty order can be challenged:

---

⚖️ Possible Grounds for Appeal Against Section 270A Penalty Order

1. No Under-Reported Income

• The assessee may argue that there is no under-reported income, as assessed by the Assessing Officer (AO), due to:
  • Incorrect computation of total income
  • Acceptance of valid claims or deductions
  • Disallowances based on interpretation

2. Bona Fide Mistake / Reasonable Cause [Section 270A(6)]

• Certain cases are excluded from being treated as under-reporting, such as:
  • Bona fide computational errors
  • Income disclosed in return but disallowed on interpretation
  • Transfer pricing adjustments made voluntarily
  • Income assessed as per Section 115JB (MAT) or 115JC (AMT), if book profit not inaccurate

Assessee can argue these exclusions apply.

3. No Mens Rea (for Misreporting)

• Misreporting attracts 200% penalty (as against 50% for under-reporting).
• Assessee can argue there was no intention to mislead, and the error was not deliberate.
• Common examples:
  • Income estimated but not concealed
  • Reliance on professional advice
  • Misreporting not fitting into categories in Section 270A(9) (e.g. suppression of facts, fake invoices)

4. Procedural Defects / Natural Justice Violation

• No proper show cause notice was issued before levy
• Opportunity of being heard not given
• Lack of clear reasoning or non-speaking order
• Order passed without jurisdiction or beyond time limits

5. Disclosure Made in Return or Revised Return

• Penalty can’t be levied if:
  • Income is voluntarily disclosed in the original return
  • Revised return filed before detection

  [Ref: SC in Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt Ltd vs CIT – genuine mistake not liable for penalty]

6. Appeal Pending on Quantum Assessment

• If the quantum addition (income enhancement) is under appeal, and:
  • Assessee has a strong prima facie case, or
  • Addition is later deleted or modified,

  then penalty under section 270A will not survive.

7. Penalty Imposed without Satisfaction

• Assessee can argue AO has not recorded satisfaction that the case involves under-reporting/misreporting at the time of initiating penalty proceedings.

8. Incorrect Classification of Misreporting Instead of Underreporting

• Arguing that the alleged misreporting is not wilful but at most under-reporting, to reduce penalty from 200% to 50%.

---

🔁 Remedies Available

---

✅ Best Practices While Appealing

• File a well-reasoned appeal with documentary evidence
• Emphasize disclosure, bona fide conduct, and reasonableness

• Ensure procedural safeguards were followed by the AO