Skip to content
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law

AnpTaxCorp

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law

jharkhand high court

Jharkhand High Court: Delay in Reinstatement Cannot Be Grounds to Deny Pension—Employer Held Responsible

26 May 2025 by Aditya Narayan Parida

In a significant judgment, the Jharkhand High Court ruled that employers cannot deny pension benefits on the basis of insufficient service or contribution if the delay in reinstatement of an employee—pursuant to a tribunal award—was due to the employer’s own …

Read more

Please share
Categories Blog, Corporate Law, Judiciary Leave a comment

Jharkhand High Court Quashes ASMT-10 Notices: Limits Scope of GST Scrutiny Under Section 61

19 May 2025 by Aditya Narayan Parida

In a significant ruling, the Jharkhand High Court has firmly restricted the scope of scrutiny under Section 61 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax (JGST) Act, 2017. The Court ruled that GST authorities cannot compare declared transaction values with …

Read more

Please share
Categories Blog, GST, Judiciary Leave a comment

Jharkhand HC Allows GST ITC on Late GSTR-3B Filing, Orders Refund of Penalty and Interest

16 December 2024 by Aditya Narayan Parida
gst

The court referred to Clause (5) of Section 16 , inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, which allows ITC claims for late-filed GST returns effective from July 1, 2017. ITC allowed on Late GSTR-3B Filing: In a pivotal …

Read more

Please share
Categories Blog, GST, Judiciary Leave a comment

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court of India clarified the essential elements of a valid legal notice
  • The Income Tax Department of India has officially released the Excel utilities for ITR-1 and ITR-4 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2025-26: Get Details Here
  • Madras High Court Directs GST Department to Consider Representation for Unblocking ITC Blocked Under Rule 86A
  • Gujarat High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Grasim Industries, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost on Tax Department
  • NBFCs, Banks Agree on 18% GST for Co-Lending Charges as RBI Pushes Model Expansion
  • Chhattisgarh High Court: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Under CGST Act When Alternative Remedy Exists, Except in Exceptional Circumstances
  • No Vicarious Liability Under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act Without Proof of Responsibility: Himachal Pradesh High Court
  • Allahabad High Court Emphasizes Need for Reasoned GST Orders, Even if Taxpayer Fails to Respond to SCN
  • Finance Minister Meets India Inc to Discuss GST 2.0 Reforms: Push for Simplified Tax Structure Gains Momentum
  • Section 10(26) Tax Exemption Not Automatic: J&K High Court Clarifies Eligibility Criteria

Featured Post

  • Supreme Court of India clarified the essential elements of a valid legal notice
  • The Income Tax Department of India has officially released the Excel utilities for ITR-1 and ITR-4 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2025-26: Get Details Here
  • Madras High Court Directs GST Department to Consider Representation for Unblocking ITC Blocked Under Rule 86A
  • Gujarat High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Grasim Industries, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost on Tax Department
  • NBFCs, Banks Agree on 18% GST for Co-Lending Charges as RBI Pushes Model Expansion

About Us

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us
©2024 Anp TaxCorp all rights reserved