Skip to content
AnpTaxCorp
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law

AnpTaxCorp

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Judiciary
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • News & Updates
  • Corporate Law

protective addition

There Can Be No Protective Addition In Absence Of Substantive Addition: ITAT Delhi

30 September 202326 September 2023 by Adv Aditya Narayan
protective addition

In the case before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi, the issue revolved around the assessment of an Assessee Firm, which had declared an income of Rs.12,220 during the relevant year. The firm was engaged in a wholesale scrap …

Read more

Please share
Categories Blog, Judiciary Leave a comment

Recent Posts

  • Mumbai ITAT Ruling in Sonu Sood Case: Fresh Statement u/s 131 Justifies Reopening of Completed Assessments Under New Reassessment Regime
  • Voluntary GST Payment After Audit Does Not Bar Section 74 Proceedings: Patna High Court
  • Employee Relies on Form 16, Faces ₹51.2 Lakh Penalty — Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Provides Crucial Relief
  • Reassessment Under Sections 147 & 148: Supreme Court Clarifies the Law in Sanand Properties Case
  • Bombay High Court Quashes ₹10.25 Crore GST Demand on Capital First Post-Amalgamation with IDFC First Bank
  • Corporate Guarantees Without Consideration Not Taxable Under GST: Bombay High Court Delivers Major Relief to Holding Companies
  • Mere Disclosure of Transactions Does Not Prevent Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sections 147 & 148
  • Orissa High Court Enhances MACT Compensation to ₹1.18 Crore: Favourable Tax Regime and Statutory Benefits Protected
  • Supreme Court Upholds Deletion of ₹16.61 Crore Addition in Mahamaya Steel Industries Case: No Taxation on Mere Guesswork
  • “Others” Is Not a Valid Reason: Gauhati High Court Quashes Non-Speaking GST Registration Cancellation Order

Featured Post

  • Mumbai ITAT Ruling in Sonu Sood Case: Fresh Statement u/s 131 Justifies Reopening of Completed Assessments Under New Reassessment Regime
  • Voluntary GST Payment After Audit Does Not Bar Section 74 Proceedings: Patna High Court
  • Employee Relies on Form 16, Faces ₹51.2 Lakh Penalty — Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Provides Crucial Relief
  • Reassessment Under Sections 147 & 148: Supreme Court Clarifies the Law in Sanand Properties Case
  • Bombay High Court Quashes ₹10.25 Crore GST Demand on Capital First Post-Amalgamation with IDFC First Bank
  • Archive

About Us

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us
©2025 Anp TaxCorp all rights reserved
  • Home
  • Corporate Law