Can GST Authorities in a Transit State Detain Goods and Impose Penalties for Inter-State Transactions not Originating or Ending within that State? Allahabad HC clarifies

In a significant ruling with far-reaching implications for inter-State trade under GST, the Allahabad High Court has drawn a clear distinction between verification powers and penal jurisdiction of GST authorities in transit States. The judgment in M/s Maruti Enterprises & Ors. vs State of U.P. (dated …

Read more

Please share

Allahabad High Court Warns Against Criminal Action on Advocates for Professional Acts in GST Matters

In a significant ruling reinforcing the independence of the legal profession, the Allahabad High Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against an advocate for actions performed in his professional capacity. The judgment sends a strong message against the growing tendency …

Read more

Please share

“Others” Is Not a Valid Reason: Gauhati High Court Quashes Non-Speaking GST Registration Cancellation Order

In a significant ruling protecting taxpayers against arbitrary administrative action, the Gauhati High Court has held that GST registration cannot be cancelled through a vague and non-speaking order. The Court emphasized that authorities exercising statutory powers under the GST law …

Read more

Please share

Consolidated GST Show Cause Notices Across Multiple Years Permissible: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Legal Position

In a significant ruling that brings clarity to GST litigation and procedural practice, the Karnataka High Court has held that tax authorities are legally permitted to issue a single consolidated show cause notice (SCN) covering multiple financial years or tax periods under Sections 73 …

Read more

Please share

GST Authorities Cannot Compel a Taxpayer to Appear in Person When the Statute Clearly Permits Representation Through an Authorised Representative: Calcutta HC

In a significant ruling reinforcing procedural fairness under GST law, the Calcutta High Court has held that tax authorities cannot compel a taxpayer to appear in person when the statute clearly permits representation through an authorised representative. The judgment underscores …

Read more

Please share